The Beloved Disciple : whose witness validates the Gospel of John? / James H. Charlesworth
Language: англійська.Edition Statement: First edition.Description: xxv, 481 pages ; 24 cmISBN: 1563381354; 9781563381355.Dewey: 226.5/092, 20Classification: 11.46 ; BC 7250Contents note: An exegesis of the passages in the Gospel of John that mention the Beloved Disciple -- The Beloved Disciple: scholars' suggestions -- Fresh insights suggesting that Thomas is the Beloved Disciple -- Evidence and speculation as to who is not the Beloved Disciple -- The Beloved Disciple and "the other" -- The Johannine School and the School of Thomas -- The Beloved Disciple and Peter: a rivalry between East and West? -- The Gospel of Thomas and Thomas as the Beloved Disciple Abstract: The Gospel of John refers five times to "the disciple whom Jesus loved." From the second through the present century, scholars have sought to identify this "disciple," traditionally concluding that he is the author of the Gospel and is indeed none other than John the son of Zebedee. In recent phases of research, however, the identification of the Beloved Disciple with John the son of Zebedee has been exposed as weak and unpersuasive. Yet, according to James Charlesworth, even this new research is problematic in that it tends to ascribe priority in discerning the meaning of the Gospel of John to documents other than the Gospel itself. Moreover, this research tends to impute historical accuracy to documents that were not primarily intended to present histories. Based on extensive research, then, Professor Charlesworth has concluded that the primary texts in the Gospel of John and the reflections of modern scholars indicate that any identification of the Beloved Disciple - whether with one of the disciples specified in the Gospel, with one who is anonymous in this Gospel, or with some symbolic theme - must provide credible answers to eight questions..Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references (pages 438-449) and indexes..Subject - Personal Name: Beloved Disciple | Disciple bien-aimé | Beloved Disciple Subject - Title: Bible -- Criticism, interpretation, etc | Bible | Bible -- Criticism, interpretation, etc | Bible -- Biographies | Bible -- Critique, interprétation, etc | Bible | Bibel Subject - Topical Name: 11.46 study and interpretation of the New Testament | Lieblingsjünger | Johannes (bijbelboek) | Lieblingsjünger Subject: Beloved Disciple | Bible / N.T / John Criticism, interpretation, etc Online Resources:Click here to access online| Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Книги
|
Бібліотека ТХІ Загальний фонд | 226.5092 C4778 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 4317911839 |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 438-449) and indexes.
An exegesis of the passages in the Gospel of John that mention the Beloved Disciple -- The Beloved Disciple: scholars' suggestions -- Fresh insights suggesting that Thomas is the Beloved Disciple -- Evidence and speculation as to who is not the Beloved Disciple -- The Beloved Disciple and "the other" -- The Johannine School and the School of Thomas -- The Beloved Disciple and Peter: a rivalry between East and West? -- The Gospel of Thomas and Thomas as the Beloved Disciple.
The Gospel of John refers five times to "the disciple whom Jesus loved." From the second through the present century, scholars have sought to identify this "disciple," traditionally concluding that he is the author of the Gospel and is indeed none other than John the son of Zebedee. In recent phases of research, however, the identification of the Beloved Disciple with John the son of Zebedee has been exposed as weak and unpersuasive. Yet, according to James Charlesworth, even this new research is problematic in that it tends to ascribe priority in discerning the meaning of the Gospel of John to documents other than the Gospel itself. Moreover, this research tends to impute historical accuracy to documents that were not primarily intended to present histories. Based on extensive research, then, Professor Charlesworth has concluded that the primary texts in the Gospel of John and the reflections of modern scholars indicate that any identification of the Beloved Disciple - whether with one of the disciples specified in the Gospel, with one who is anonymous in this Gospel, or with some symbolic theme - must provide credible answers to eight questions.
There are no comments on this title.